The three things that we had done well:1)Our research was well organised.
2)Good use of technology
.



3)The level of details.
The only criticism we had was that we could have made it easier for ourselves by creating a presentation that would have stored all our work. So that when presenting, we wouldn't need to scroll up or down trying to find the next post.
They enjoyed the way we spoke about the audience and synergy, clearly identifying both elements. Marisa particularly loved our concept of loss. Where we spoke about how that will be a theme that we show constantly. Due to the fact that this is a sensitive manner, everyone eventually experiences it in their life and its something that could be used to draw people together, to create a shared consensus and single moral community, in that case. So if we can actually produce that, it will be great.
In all honesty, I can't identify anything I need to improve, I feel like all I need to do is keep up with the level of work, the detail, try out new technologies, expand the range that I'm used to using.
We were told that we got a 10/10. I'm so proud, as we put in so much work to make sure we have literally every element identified and detailed. Which was effective, because even when we were questioned, we were able to quickly justify or clarify it.
Personally, I feel like my work is at least 17/20. As I still feel like my work need a little more push.

No comments:
Post a Comment